El discurso sobre la ciudad desde el poder en Foucault

Arturo Valdivia Loro

doi:10.29105/contexto16.24-296

Autores/as

Arturo Valdivia Loro Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/contexto16.24-296

Palabras clave:

Comunidad discursiva, Michel Foucault, poder, ciudad

Resumen

El análisis del poder postulado por Michel Foucault está presente en distintas disciplinas del conocimiento y la ciudad no es la excepción. Sin embargo, es de especial interés en tanto la ciudad es un dispositivo que permite facilitar la libertad o la sujeción del sujeto, produciéndolo y sometiéndolo. Los avances en las investigaciones que relacionan la ciudad con el poder cada vez son más, motivo por el cual se vuelve necesario una revisión del discurso con el objetivo de demostrar las distintas comunidades que se han formado. Para tal fin se analizan publicaciones (capítulos de libros y artículos) en revistas indexadas en Scopus con el programa gephi logrando identificar siete comunidades discursivas. A saber, la ciudad: concebida para el poder, como dispositivo de poder, como productor de sujeto, como dispositivo de vigilancia y como policía (desde un método genealógico). Además de dos discursos en proceso de construcción asociado a las smarts cities y la gobernanza; demostrando la presencia, vigencia y necesidad de continuar con más investigaciones que analicen el poder y la ciudad.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Aliaga, F., & Correa, A. (2011). Tendencias en la normalización de nombres de autores en publicaciones científicas. 17(1), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.17.1.4124

Bazin, Y., & Naccache, P. (2016). The Emergence of Heterotopia as a Heuristic Concept to Study Organization. European Management Review, 13(3), 225-233. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12082

Bruzzone, M. (2019). «Each punishment should be a fable»: Punitive analytics, the punitive-city diagram, and punishment as technology of power in Foucault’s works of the 1970s and 1980s. Foucault Studies, 26, 64-90. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i26.5755 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i26.5755

Bushnell, M. (2003). Teachers in the schoolhouse panopticon complicity and resistance. Education and Urban Society, 35(3), 251-272. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124503035003001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124503035003001

CDDL & GNU. (2017). Gephi (0.9.2) [Java; Windows 7 versión 6.1 que se ejecuta en x86; Cp1252; es_PE (gephi)]. https://gephi.org/

Cheong, S.-M., & Miller, M. L. (2000). Power and tourism: A Foucauldian observation. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(2), 371-390. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00065-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00065-1

Clegg, S. R., Pitsis, T. S., Rura-Polley, T., & Marosszeky, M. (2002). Governmentality Matters: Designing an Alliance Culture of Inter-organizational Collaboration for Managing Projects. Organization Studies, 23(3), 317-337. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840602233001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840602233001

Coyles, D. (2017). Journeys through the Hidden City: Giving visibility to the Material Events of conflict in Belfast. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(6), 1053-1075. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775817707528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775817707528

Davidson, A. I. (2011). In praise of counter-conduct. History of the Human Sciences, 24(4), 25-41. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695111411625 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695111411625

de La Robertie, C., & Lebrument, N. (2019). Unplugged - Thinking the organisational and managerial challenges of intelligent towns and cities: A critical approach to the Smart Cities phenomenon. Management (France), 22(2), 357-372. Scopus. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.222.0357

Dodsworth, F. (2012). Mobility and Civility: Police and the Formation of the Modern City. En The New Blackwell Companion to the City (pp. 235-244). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444395105.ch20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444395105.ch20

Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for civil society? British Journal of Sociology, 49(2), 210-233. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.2307/591310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/591310

Flyvbjerg, Bent. (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363

Hollinshead, K. (1999). Surveillance of the worlds of tourism: Foucault and the eye-of-power. Tourism Management, 20(1), 7-23. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00090-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00090-9

Klauser, F., Paasche, T., & Söderström, O. (2014). Michel foucault and the smart city: Power dynamics inherent in contemporary governing through code. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(5), 869-885. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13041p DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d13041p

Landaeta, P., Arias, J., & Espinoza, R. (2017). The «urban question»: Notes to a diagram of the relation government and police on Michel Foucault. Recerca, 21, 87-105. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.6035/Recerca.2017.21.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6035/Recerca.2017.21.5

León Casero, J., & Urabayen, J. (2017). Heterotopia and capitalism in architecture. The ideological function of heterotopias as own discours of the architectural discipline in the age of biopolitical governance. Arbor, 193(784). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2017.784n2008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2017.784n2008

León Casero, J., & Urabayen, J. (2018). Space, power and governmentality. Architecture and urban planning in the work of Foucault. Anales del Instituto de Investigaciones Esteticas, 40(112), 181-212. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22201/iie.18703062e.2018.112.2634 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iie.18703062e.2018.112.2634

Mardones, P. L., & Lolas, R. E. (2014). Geophilosophy of the city to think beyond of Organism. Revista de Filosofia: Aurora, 26(38), 295-314. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.7213/aurora.26.038.AO.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7213/aurora.26.038.AO.07

Mckee, K. (2009). Post-Foucauldian governmentality: What does it offer critical social policy analysis? Critical Social Policy, 29(3), 465-486. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018309105180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018309105180

Mckinnon, K. (2011). Identification. En A Companion to Social Geography (pp. 37-54). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444395211.ch3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444395211.ch3

Minhoto, L. D. (2015). Foucault and the blind spot in the analysis of the contemporary punitive turn. Lua Nova, 1(95), 289-311. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-6445289-311/95 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-6445289-311/95

Moraña, M. (2017). Transculturation and Latin americanism. Cuadernos de Literatura, 21(41), 153-166. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cl21-41.trla DOI: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cl21-41.trla

Outtes, J. (2002). Disciplinning society through the city: The genesis of city planning in Brazil and Argentina (1894-1945). Eure, 28(83), 7-29. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612002008300002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612002008300002

Paasche, T. F., & Klauser, F. R. (2015). Surveillance and Privacy, Geography of. En International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition (pp. 727-732). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.72124-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.72124-6

Pastor Martín, J., & Ovejero Bernal, A. (2005). Michel Foucault, pensador, intelectual específico y profesor universitario comprometido. Aula abierta, 86, 75-86.

Renzi, A., & Elmer, G. (2013). The Biopolitics of Sacrifice: Securing Infrastructure at the G20 Summit. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(5), 45-69. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412474327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412474327

Rodríguez-Morales, A. (2013). Scopus y su importancia actual en la publicación científica Colombiana. Scientia Et Technica, 18(4), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.22517/23447214.9113

Rosol, M. (2014). On resistance in the post-political city: Conduct and counter-conduct in Vancouver. Space and Polity, 18(1), 70-84. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2013.879785 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2013.879785

Ruddick, S. M. (2009). Society-Space. En International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 217-226). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00744-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00744-6

Schwember, F., & Urabayen, J. (2018). At the Margins of Ideal Cities: The Dystopian Drift of Modern Utopias. SAGE Open, 8(4). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018803135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018803135

Self, J. (2013). Darwin among the machines. Architectural Design, 83(4), 66-71. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1620

Tosetto, F. (2018). “Prospettiva”: A Contemporary Conceptual Method. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 3, 1388-1393. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57937-5_143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57937-5_143

Urry, J. (2002). The Tourist Gaze (2da. Edición). SAGE.

Wang, D. (2017). Foucault and the smart city. Design Journal, 20(sup1), S4378-S4386. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352934

Yang, C. (2020). Historicizing the smart cities: Genealogy as a method of critique for smart urbanism. Telematics and Informatics, 55. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101438