Factors, dimensions and variables determinant in the quality of open public spaces
Contribution from the scientific literature (2009-2020)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/contexto19.29-430Keywords:
Quality of open public spaces, dimensions, factors and variables, literature reviewAbstract
Several studies have shown that the good quality of open public spaces (EPA) is essential to guarantee their use, increase their frequency of visits and positively influence the perception of users. For this reason, it is worrying that an increasing interest is being paid to the indexes that make it possible to quantify the square meters of this public asset, leaving aside the conditions that make it possible to measure whether these meters are efficient in their use. In this article, we seek to contribute from the review of scientific literature to the systematization of information related to the factors, dimensions and variables that determine the quality of the EPAs, contained in the articles published in databases from 2009 to 2020. The results show that the dimension of physical characteristics is the most recurrent in the studies, while the variables related to inclusion are the least evaluated. Quality studies can use quantitative, qualitative, or mixed assessment instruments. It is also evident that there are few studies on this subject at the Latin American level and that most have been carried out in Asian and European countries.
Downloads
References
Askari, A. H., & Soltani, S. (2019). Determinants of a successful public open space: the case of Dataran Merdeka in the city centre of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Landscape Research, 44(2), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2018.1427221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2018.1427221
Bratina Jurkovič, N. (2014). Perception, experience and the use of public urban spaces by residents of urban neighbourhoods. Urbani Izziv, 25(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2014-25-01-003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2014-25-01-003
Carmona, M. (2019). Principles for public space design, planning to do better. Urban Design International, 24(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-018-0070-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-018-0070-3
Carr, S. M. , F. L. , R. G. , and S. A. M. (1992). Public Space.
Cilliers, E. J., & Timmermans, W. (2016). Transforming spaces into lively public open places: case studies of practical interventions. In Journal of Urban Design (Vol. 21, Issue 6, pp. 836–849). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2016.1234336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2016.1234336
Naranjo et al. (2018). Generación de criterios para definición y clasificación del espacio público abierto en Ecuador. Caso de Quito, Cuenca e Ibarra. Colección Ecuatoriana de Estudios Sobre La Ciudad - Colección Civitic, 49–73.
El-Husseiny, M.-A., & Kesseiba, K. (2012). Challenges of Social Sustainability in Neo-liberal Cairo: Re- Questioning the Role of Public Space. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.267
Evans, J., & Jones, P. (2011). The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place. Applied Geography, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.09.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.09.005
Francis, J., Giles-Corti, B., Wood, L., & Knuiman, M. (2012). Creating sense of community: The role of public space. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.07.002
Garnica Berrocal, R., & Eduardo Jiménez Caldera, J. (2013). La calidad de vida urbana y la dimensión físico-espacial del espacio público: aportes metodológicos para el ordenamiento territorial de Montería Quality of urban life and the physical-spatial dimension of public space: methodological contributions to the management and urban planning (Vol. 18, Issue 2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/01233769.2678
Gehl, J., Kaefer, L. J., & Reigstad, S. (2006). Close encounters with buildings. In Urban Design International (Vol. 11, Issue 1, pp. 29–47). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000162
Heffernan, E., Heffernan, T., & Pan, W. (2014). The relationship between the quality of active frontages and public perceptions of public spaces. Urban Design International, 19(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.16
Heng, C. K., & Chan, V. (2000). The making of successful public space : a case study of People ’ s Park Square. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave/udi/9000006
Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
Kaczynskl, A. T., & Henderson, K. A. (2008). Parks and recreation settings and active living: A review of associations with physical activity function and intensity. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.5.4.619 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.5.4.619
Koohsari, M. J., Mavoa, S., Villianueva, K., Sugiyama, T., Badland, H., Kaczynski, A. T., Owen, N., & Giles-Corti, B. (2015). Public open space, physical activity, urban design and public health: Concepts, methods and research agenda. Health and Place, 33, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.02.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.02.009
Madanipour, A. (2021). Whose public space? International case studies in urban design and development. In Public Space Reader. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351202558-64 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351202558-64
Mean, M. , & T. C. (2005). People make places: Growing the public life of cities (London: Demos).
Mehta, V. (2014). Evaluating Public Space. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 53–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854698 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854698
Mishra, H. S., Bell, S., Vassiljev, P., Kuhlmann, F., Niin, G., & Grellier, J. (2020a). The development of a tool for assessing the environmental qualities of urban blue spaces. In Urban Forestry and Urban Greening (Vol. 49). Elsevier GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126575
Mishra, H. S., Bell, S., Vassiljev, P., Kuhlmann, F., Niin, G., & Grellier, J. (2020b). The development of a tool for assessing the environmental qualities of urban blue spaces. In Urban Forestry and Urban Greening (Vol. 49). Elsevier GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126575 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126575
Moskowitz, M. (2002). Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris and Tridib Banerjee, Urban Design Downtown: Poetics and Politics of Form (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998, £30.00). Pp. 380. ISBN 0 520 20930 3. . Journal of American Studies, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021875802696872 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021875802696872
Nikšič, M., & Watson, G. B. (2018). Urban public open space in the mental image of users: the elements connecting urban public open spaces in a spatial network. Journal of Urban Design, 23(6), 859–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1377066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1377066
Paasche, T. F. (2012). Creating parallel public spaces through private governments: A South African case study. South African Geographical Journal, 94(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2012.668761 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2012.668761
Project for Public Space. (2001). How to turn a place around—A handbook for creating successful public spaces. .
Pugalis, L. (2009). The culture and economics of urban public space design: Public and professional perceptions. Urban Design International, 14(4), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2009.23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2009.23
Rey Gozalo, G., Barrigón Morillas, J. M., Montes González, D., & Atanasio Moraga, P. (2018). Relationships among satisfaction, noise perception, and use of urban green spaces. Science of the Total Environment, 624, 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.148
Rostami, R., Lamit, H., Khoshnava, S. M., & Rostami, R. (2016). Successful public places: A case study of historical Persian gardens. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 15, 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.08.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.08.011
Sakip, S. R., Akhir, N. M., & Omar, S. S. (2015). Determinant Factors of Successful Public Parks in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170, 422–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.003
Sakip, S. R. M., Akhir, N. M., & Omar, S. S. (2015). Determinant Factors of Successful Public Parks in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170, 422–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.003
Sennett, R. (1992). The Fall of Public Man. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Stauskis, G. (2010). IstoriniŲ sveikatos prieŽiŪros objektŲ architektŪrinĖ raida vilniaus mieste. Town Planning and Architecture, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.3846/tpa.2010.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tpa.2010.05
Thomas, M. (1991). The Demise of Public Space.” In Town Planning Responses to City Change ( and J. D. V. Nadin, Ed.; Avebury: Aldershot.).
Urban Land Institute. (2004). The Design of Public Places. . New York: Visual Preference Publications.
Veselý, M., & Vacek, L. (2013). To the problems of revitalization of public spaces in Eastern Bloc housing estates. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 37(3), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2013.841332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2013.841332
Wang, Z., & Stevens, Q. (2020). How do open space characteristics influence open space use? A study of Melbourne’s Southbank Promenade. Urban Research and Practice, 13(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1484152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1484152
Zamanifard, H., Alizadeh, T., Bosman, C., & Coiacetto, E. (2019). Measuring experiential qualities of urban public spaces: users’ perspective. Journal of Urban Design, 24(3), 340–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1484664 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1484664
Zukin, S. (1995). The Cultures of Cities. (MA: Blackwell).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 GABRIELA MEJIA GOMEZ, Gabriela Naranjo Serrano, Javier Benavides Alvarez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
1. The authors keep the copyright and give the journal the right of the first publication, with their content registered under the Creative Commons License, which lets third parties to use the published material as long as they mention the authors and the first publication from the journal.
2. The authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in the journal (for example an institutional repository or a book) provided that they explicitly mention that the content was first published in CONTEXTO. Revista de la Facultad de Arquitectura de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León..